Could Jeff Bezos Really End World Hunger if He Wanted To?

Jeff Bezos is incredibly wealthy. The most extravagant man on the planet has a total asset of $170 billion. His wealth turns into beyond measure when you break it down. Bezos earn $2500 per second. That works out at $150,000 per minute. Every golden hour, he turns into a tycoon multiple times over. In the event that Jeff Bezos was a country, he would be the 54th wealthiest country on the planet. His title as the world’s most extravagant individual means that he’s adored as an incredible capitalist, entrepreneurial success story.

But Then, his extraordinary riches contrast with millions enduring the weakening effects of poverty.

A child dies every 3 seconds like clockwork. Every single minute 9 individuals die from the absence of safe drinking water. Every hour more than 2000 individuals die from irresistible infection, a significant number of which could be prevented for a single dollar for each individual.

What makes these figures even more heartbreaking is that we have the way to take care of these issues. Anyway, in reality, as we know it where money talks, could a man more extravagant than most countries utilize his wealth to fathom them?

Settling world hunger

By all accounts, the issue with irresistible illness appears to be moderately basic for Bezos to resolve. In the event that an irresistible illness costs around $1 per individual to prevent, it would cost $2000 an hour to provide cure to infectious diseases. Little change for Bezos, who might have made $9.5 million in that time. On the off chance that Bezos guided a small amount of his money to prevent infectious diseases, a great many individuals’ lives would be spared. What a brilliant accomplishment that would be.

World hunger, then again, is an entire diverse ball game. More than 800 million individuals go hungry every year, yet we make enough food to take care of 10 billion individuals.

The reason individuals go hungry and die of starvation is because of poverty and imbalance, not a shortage. Numerous individuals have no way to acquire enough cash to purchase food.

Indeed, even the wealthiest man such as Bezos couldn’t take care of such a huge issue, since offering cash to the poor is a contributor to the issue. Philanthropy, or charity, doesn’t change the basic social and monetary reasons for poverty.

The Chinese philosopher Lao Tzu once stated, “give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.” A version of this saying for the present-day maybe, give a man a plate of food, you feed him for a day. Get Rid Of the barriers that lead to man’s hunger, you should empower him to take care of himself for a lifetime.

A world of extremes

A consumer-driven society is a world of extremes, where fewer individuals may have a little too much, and too many may have nothing by any means.

In the event that poverty is a result of how we get things done, it appears glaringly evident we have to upgrade the framework to change the result. Since nobody decides to be poor, nobody decides to go hungry, nobody needs the existence of suffering.

Envision if Bezos began scrutinizing a system of extremes that makes him so rich at the cost of so many. He could stand out forever as the man that catalyzed a change in society.

It’s you and I making Bezos rich by purchasing stuff from Amazon. All to satisfy our capacity as consumers. Individuals need to wake up from the lie that the more you purchase, the more joyful you’ll be. If anything, the inverse is the case. The more you purchase, the more you need to purchase. Like a hamster on a running wheel, you generally end up in a similar spot. Needing more.

In years to come, when the frenzy is finished, the world’s very rich people and the news sources who celebrated, legitimized, and lionized their wealth will be criticized as symbols of the time of consumption. Where corruption was praised in the face of human misery.